Get this shirtHave you ever smelled something that made you think of sitting in the sand on the beach. Random aside.
So, this is really more of a statement than a question. I ran into a dude last night in a restaurant who just started talking to me. Turns out that he’s independently wealthy, doesn’t work, and has spent much of his time in the last five years editing Wikipedia articles. Oh, and he’s crazy.
I thought it was really cool to actually meet someone who actually helped contribute to the info source that has beat out all others for quick check ups on topics from the meaningful (example, the state of Biafra ) to the mundane (example: fish sticks ). Where did he get his information? What was his motivation? Was he one of those people that monitored posts, ferreting out erroneous entries like a hunter on a trail.
Turns out that the guy was just kind of crazy. His topics dealt with discussing people who were still alive. He said he “went after” people of privilege, doctors, lawyers, politicians, and that he recorded anything he thought was relevant. He harped on the fact that such people were always getting away with things that they shouldn’t, and I guess he thought that somehow, by writing (what he inferred were negative things about people), he was making it right. So, basically, if someone that he thought was too successful did something he disagreed with, he would write a negative encyclopedia article about them for the world to consume.
Maybe I’m just sensitive to this because I’ve been the target of media criticism. He did indicate that he sometimes consulted his subjects while he was writing. Which indicated to me that perhaps it’s not all negative.
I’m still disillusioned. Will I keep using wikipedia, now that the curtain has been removed, and the Wizard is just some wako in a coffee shop? What else would I use?
Get this shirt!

Get this shirt




